Accueil || Parcours || Recherche || S'enregistrer || Mon Compte || Contacts || Aide || Langues
Hrimech, Hamid (2009) Evaluation de métaphores d'interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distans d'immersion virtuelle. Doctorat Informatique, Le2i, ENSAM 2009ENAM0027 p.200.
Plein texte disponible en tant que :
|
|
Résumé
Dans la phase de conception d’un environnement virtuel (EV), il est nécessaire de prendre en compte plusieurs facteurs comme les périphériques d’entrées/sorties, la métaphore d’interaction ou encore le domaine d’application. En plus de ces considérations, un environnement virtuel collaboratif (EVC) doit prendre en compte l’aspect collaboratif de la métaphore d’interaction. Tout d’abord, la métaphore d’interaction doit pouvoir apporter la performance de la tâche la meilleure possible. Ensuite, l’influence de la métaphore d’interaction sur l’expérience des utilisateurs (au sens psychologique et social) constitue une importante question de recherche. Dans ce contexte, deux études expérimentales ont été menées : la première vise à étudier l’effet de métaphores de navigation sur l’expérience de l’utilisateur dans un EVC et la seconde s’intéresse à l’effet de métaphores de manipulation sur l’expérience de l’utilisateur dans un EVC. Les résultats obtenus dans ce travail de thèse nous amènent à proposer un ensemble de critères et de règles de conception des EVCs
| Type d'EPrint: | Thèse (Doctorat) |
|---|---|
| Directeur de Thèse: | Merienne, Frederic |
| Date: | 21 Octobre 2009 |
| Jury de Thèse: | Thouvenin, Indira et Mallem, Malik et Loonis, Pierre et Merienne, Frederic et Alem, Leila |
| Ecole Doctorale: | ED 432 ECOLE DOCTORALE SCIENCES DES METIERS DE L'INGENIEUR |
| Discipline: | Informatique |
| Fonds: | Arts et Métiers ParisTech (ENSAM) |
| Institution: | ENSAM |
| Laboratoire: | Le2i |
| Sujets: | 2. Sciences et technologies de l'information et de la communication |
| Mots-clés libres: | 3Dinteraction, interaction 3D, Human factors, Facteurs humains, Cve, Evc |
| Code ID: | 5576 |
| Déposé par : | hamid hrimech |
| Déposé le : | 01 Décembre 2009 |
Références Bibliographiques
Bibliographie 145
Bibliographie
Anneli, A., Olof, H., Kristian, S., Marten, S., & Olov, S. (1994). DIVE - the distributed interactive
virtual environmentSwedish Institute of Computer Science, Box 1263, 164 28 Kista.
Arnaldi, B., Fuchs, P., & Tisseau, J. (Eds.). (2003). Chapitre 1 du volume 1 du traité de la réalité
virtuelle Les Presses de l’Ecole des Mines de Paris.
Arnaldi, B., Berthoz, A., Burkhardt, J. M., Fuchs, P., Guitton, P., Moreau, G., et al (Eds.).
(2006). Le traité de la réalité virtuelle : Les application de la realité virtuelle Mines de paris.
Avango.(1999). Avango.http://www.avango.org/
Avradinis, N., Vosinakis, S., & Panayiotopoulos, T. (2000). Using virtual reality techniques for the
simulation of physics experiments
Bar-Shalom, Y., & Li, R. (1995). Multitarget-mulisensor tracking.
Bell, J. T., & Fogler, H. S. (2004). Virtual reality in chemical engineering education. Paper
presented at the Purdue University, West, 16-18.
Benford , S., & Fahl'en , L. (1993). A spatial model of interaction in large virtual environments.
Paper presented at the ECSCW'93: Proceedings of the Third Conference on European Conference on
Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Milan, Italy. 109-124.
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
146 Bibliographie
Benford, S., Bowers, J., Fahl´en, L. E., & Mariani, J. (1994). Supporting cooperative work in
virtual environments. The Computer Journal, 37(4), 653-668.
Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Rodden, T., & Pycock, J. (2001). Collaborative virtual
environments, commun run. ACM, 44(7), 79-85.
Benford, S., & Greenhalgh, C. (1997). Introducing third party objects into the spatial model of
interaction. Paper presented at the ECSCW'97: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on European
Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Lancaster, UK. 189-204.
Beth, R. M., & Carroll, J. M. (2002). Usability engineering scenario-based development of
human-computer interaction. In Morgan Kaufmann (Ed.), Interactive technologies. (Academic
Press ed., ). San Fancisco, USA:
Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Gregg, J. (2001). The networked minds measure of social presence:
Pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. Presence, , 9-11.
Bouguila, L., Ishii, M., & Sato, M. (2000). Multi-modal haptic device for large-scale virtual
environments. ACM Multimedia 2000, , 277-283.
Bowers, J., Pycock, J., & O'Brien, J. (1996). Talk and embodiment in collaborative virtual
environments. Paper presented at the CHI '96: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on
Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 58-65. Retrieved
from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/238386.238404
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
Bibliographie 147
Bowman, D. A., Hodges, L. F., Allison, D., & Wineman, J. (1999). The educational value of an
information-rich virtual environment. Paper presented at the Presence: Teleoperators and
Virtual Environments, 317-331.
Bowman, D. A., Kruijff, E., Laviola, J. J., & Poupyrev, I. (Eds.). (2004). 3D user interfaces: Theory
and practice Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.
Bowman, D. A., Ohnson, D. B., & Hodges, L. F. (1999a). Testbed evaluation of virtual
environment interaction techniques. Paper presented at the VRST '99: Proceedings of the
ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, London, United Kingdom. 26-33.
Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/323663.323667
Bowman, D. A., Koller, D., & Hodges, L. F. (1998). A methodology for the evaluation of
travel techniques for immersive virtual environments. Journal of the Virtual Reality Society, 3,
120-131.
Buxton, W. (1983). Lexical and pragmatic considerations of input structures. In Computer
Graphics, 17(1), 31-37.
Carassa, A., Geminiani, G., Morganti, F., & Varotto. D. (2002, Route and survey descriptions
of paths: The effect of experience of a large-scale environment. Bulletin of People-
Environment Studies,
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
148 Bibliographie
Card, S., Mackinlay, J., & Robertson, G. (1991). A morphological analysis of the design space
of input devices. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 9(2), 99-122.
Casanueva, J. S., & Blake, E. H. (2001). The effects of avatars on co-presence in a collaborative virtual
environmentAnnual Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and
Information Technologists (SAICSIT2001). Pretoria, South.
Casanueva, J. S., & Blake, E. H. (2000). Small group experiments in collaborative virtual
environments. Paper presented at the Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Chevaldonne , M., Saimpont , A., Merienne , F., & Pozzo , T. (2006). Postural empathy tests
for the measure of immersion and presence in virtual environment. Cuncun, Mexique.
Churchill, E. F., Snowdon, D. N., & Munrr , A. J. (Eds.). (2001). Collaborative virtual environments
Springer.
Comaniciu, D., & Meer, P. (1999). Mean shift analysis and application.
Coquillart, S., Arnaldi, B., Berthoz, A., Burkhardt, J. M., Fuchs, P., Guitton, P., et al (Eds.).
(2006). Le traité de la réalité virtuelle : Interfaçage, immersion et interaction en environnement virtuel
Mines de paris.
Darken, R. P., & Sibert, J. L. (1996). Navigating large virtual spaces. International Journal of
Human–Computer Interaction, 8, 49-71.
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
Bibliographie 149
De Boeck, J., Cuppens, E., De Weyer, T., Raymaekers, C., & Coninx, K. (2004). Multisensory
interaction metaphors with haptics and proprioception in virtual environments. Paper
presented at the NordiCHI '04: Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer
Interaction, Tampere, Finland. 189-197. Retrieved from
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1028014.1028043
De Boeck, J., Raymaekers, C., & Coninx, K. (2005). Are existing metaphors in virtual
environments suitable for haptic interaction. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 7th
International Conference on Virtual Reality ({VRIC} 2005), 261-268.
De Luca, L., Véron, P., & Florenzano, M. (2006). Reverse engineering of architectural
buildings based on a hybrid modeling approach . Computers & Graphics, 30(2), 160-176.
Degrande, S. Spin 3D.http://ralyx.inria.fr/2002/Raweb/alcove/uid43.html
Deutsch, J. E., Latonio, J., Burdea, G. C., & Boian, R. (2001). Post-stroke rehabilitation with
the rutgers ankle system: A case study. Presence: Teleoper.Virtual Environ., 10(4), 416-430.
Retrieved from 10.1162/1054746011470262;
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/1054746011470262
Divipro.(2000). Divipro.http://aig.cs.man.ac.uk/divipro/index.php
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
150 Bibliographie
Dodds, T. J., & Ruddle, R. A. (2008a). Using teleporting, awareness and multiple views to
improve teamwork in collaborative virtual environments. Proceedings of the 14th Eurographics
Symposium on Virtual Environments, , 81-88.
Dodds, T. J., & Ruddle, R. A. (2008b). Mobile group dynamics in large-scale collaborative
virtual environments. Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality, , 59-66.
Ellis, S. R. (1994). What are virtual environments. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, , 17-
22.
Férey , N., Gros , P. E., Hérisson , J., & Gherbi , R. (2004). Exploration by visualization of
numerical and textual genomic data. Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry, 4, 102-110.
Fuchs, F. (1996). Les Presses de l’Ecole des Mines de Paris (Ed.), Les interfaces de la réalité virtuelle
Fussell, S. R., Kraut, R. E., & Siegel, J. (2000). Coordination of communication: Effects of
shared visual context on collaborative work. Paper presented at the CSCW '00: Proceedings
of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 21-30. Retrieved from
10.1145/358916.358947; http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/358916.358947
Gaunet, F., Vidal, V., Kemeny, A., & and Berthoz, A. (2001, Active, passive and snapshot
exploration in a virtual environment: Influence on scene memory, reorientation and path
memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 409-420.
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
Bibliographie 151
Gaver, W. (1992). The affordances of media spaces for collaboration, ACM Conference on
Computer Supported Cooperative Work, , 17-24.
Garbaya, S., & Zaldivar-Colado, U. (2007). The affect of contact force sensations on user
performance in virtual assembly tasks. Virtual Reality, 11(4), 287-299.
Gerhard, M., Moore, D. J., & Hobbs, D. J. (2001a). Continuous presence in collaborative
virtual environments: Towards a hybrid avatar-agent model for user representation. The
Third International Workshop on Intelligent Virtual Agents, , 137-155.
Gerhard, M., Moore, D., & Hobbs, D. (2001b). Continuous presence in collaborative virtual
environments: Towards the evaluation of a hybrid avatar-agent model for user
representation. Madrid, Spain.
Gibson, W. (1989). Neuromancer. New York: Grafton.
Greenberg, S., Gutwin, C., & Cockburn, A. (1996). Awareness through fisheye views in
relaxed-WYSIWIS groupware. Graphics Interface, , 28-38.
Greenhalgh, C., & Benford, S. (1995). MASSIVE: A collaborative virtual environment for
teleconferencing. ACM Trans.Comput.-Hum.Interact., 2(3), 239-261. Retrieved from
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/210079.210088
Gutwin, C. (1997). Workspace awareness in real-time distributed groupware. (PhD thesis,
University of Calgary.).
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
152 Bibliographie
Haritaoglu, I., Harwood, D., & Davis, L. S. (1998). A real time system for detecting and
tracking people in 2,5D.
Harms , C., & Biocca, F. A. (2004). Internal consistency and reliability of the networked minds
social presence measure. Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia.
Hedley , N. R., Billinghurst, M., Postner, L., May, R., & Kato , H. (2002). Explorations in the
use of augmented reality for geographic visualization. Presence, 11, 119-133.
Held, R. M., & Durlach, N. I. (1992). Telepresence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual
Environments, 1(1), 109-112.
Herder, J., Worzberger, R., Twelker, U., & Albertz, S. (2002). Use of virtual environments in
the promotion and evaluation of architectural designs. Journal of the 3D-Forum Society, 16(4),
117-122.
Hofmann, J., & Bubb, H. (1999). 16 presence in industrial virtual environment applications —
susceptibility and measurement reliability
Horaud , R., & Monga , O. (1995). In Hermes Sciences Publicat (Ed.), Vision par ordinateur :
Outils fondamentaux. France:
IJsselsteijn, W., & Riva, G. (2003). Being there: The experience of presence in mediated
environments. In W. I. G. Riva, F. Davide (Ed.), Being There: Concepts, effects and measurement
of user presence in synthetic environments, (pp. 4-14)
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
Bibliographie 153
Ishii, H., Kobayashi, M., & Arita, K. (1994). Iterative design of seamless collaboration media.
ACM, 37(8), 83-97.
Jacob, R. J. K., & Sibert, L. E. (1992). The perceptual structure of multidimensional input
device selection. 211-218.
Johnson, W. L. (2000). Virtual environments for training.http://www.isi.edu/isd/VET/vet.html
Johnson, W. L. (1995). Pedagogical agents in virtual learning environments. Proceedings of the
International Conference on Computers and Education,
Juan De , L., & Manuel , A. (2000). Using simulation and virtual reality for distance education.
SIIE’2000
Kahkonen , K., & Whyte , J. (2003). Industrial applications of virtual reality in architecture and
construction
Kalman, R. E. (1960, A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of
Basic Engineering, , 35-45.
Lanier, J. (1988). A vintage virtual reality interview., 1988, from
http://www.well.com/user/jaron/vrint.html
Mantovani, F., Agliati, A., Mortillaro, M., Vescovo, A., & Zurloni, V. (2006). Communication -
presence roundtrip: Travelling along theoretical, methodological and applicative
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
154 Bibliographie
connections. In G. Riva , M. T. Anguera & F. Mantovani (Eds.), From communication to
presence: Cognition, emotions and culture towards the ultimate Communicative Experience (IOS Press
ed., pp. 3-22). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Mine, ,Mark R. (1995). ISAAC: A virtual environment tool for the interactive construction of virtual
worlds. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Mine, M. R. (1996). Working in a virtual world: Interaction techniques used in the chapel hill immersive
modeling program. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Naef, M., Staadt, O., & Gross, M. (2005). Multimedia integration into the blue-c API.
Computers & Graphics, 29(1), 3. Retrieved from DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2004.11.003;
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TYG-4F490FG-
1/2/f8202fedcc419d14f58291ea558507f4
Nakanishi, H., Yoshida, C., Nishimura, T., & Ishida, T. (1998). FreeWalk: A three-dimensional
meeting place for communities Retrieved from citeseer.ist.psu.edu/nakanishi98freewalk.html
Normand, V. B., C., Benford, S., Bullock, A., Carion, S., Chrysanthou, Y., Farcet, N., et al.
(1999). The COVEN project: Exploring applicative, technical, and usage dimensions of
collaborative virtual environments. Presence: Teleoper.Virtual Environ., 8(2), 218-236.
Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/105474699566189
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
Bibliographie 155
Nowak, F., & Biocca, K. L. (2003). The effect of the agency and thropomorphism of users
sense of telepresence, copresece, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence:
Teleopers and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 481-494.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurementof meaning. Urbana,
USA:
Paillot, D., Merienne, F., & Thivent, S. (2003). CAD/CAE visualization in virtual environment
for automotive industry. Zurich, Switzerland. 315-316.
Parise, S., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., & Waters, K. (1996). My partner is a real dog: Cooperation
with social agents. Paper presented at the CSCW '96: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference
on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 399-408.
Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/240080.240351
Passini, R. (1992). Wayfinding in architecture (Van Nostrand Reinhold ed.). NY:
Poupyrev, I., Weghorst, S., Billinghurst, M., & Ichikawa, T. (1997). A framework and testbed
for studying manipulation techniques for immersive VR. Paper presented at the Proceedings
of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, 21-28.
Querrec, R., Buche, C., Maffre, E., & hevaillier, P. (2003). SecuReVi : Virtual environments for
fire fighting training. Laval, France.
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
156 Bibliographie
Reid, D. B. (1979). An algorithm for tracking multiple targets. IEEE Transactions on Automatic
Control, AC-24(6), 843-854.
Riva, G. (1999). Virtual reality as communication tool: A sociocognitive analysis. Presence:
Teleoper.Virtual Environ., 8(4), 462-468. Retrieved from
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/105474699566341
Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J., & Jones, D. M. (1999a). Broad-scale navigating virtual
environments: What differences occur between helmet-mounted and desk-signal displays?
Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8, 157-168.
Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J., & Jones, D. (1997). Navigating buildings in "desk-top"
Virtual Environments: Experimental investigations using extended navigational
experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3(2)
Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J., & Jones, D. M. (1999b). The effects of maps on navigation and
search strategies in very-large-scale virtual environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Applied, 5, 54-75.
Ruth, R. (2005). Social presence as presentation of self.
Sallnas, E. L. (2005). Effects of communication mode on social presence, virtual presence, and
performance in collaborative virtual environments. Presence: Teleoper.Virtual Environ., 14(4),
434-449. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/105474605774785253
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
Bibliographie 157
Satava , R. M. (1999). Emerging technologies for surgery in the 21st century. Archives of Surgery,
134, 1197-1202.
Schroeder, R. (1996). Possible worlds: The social dynamic of virtual reality technology. Boulder, CO,
USA: Westview Press, Inc.
Schroeder, R., Steed, A., Axelsson, A., Heldal, I., Abelin, Å., Wideström, J., et al. (2001).
Collaborating in networked immersive spaces: As good as being there together? Computers
& Graphics, 25(5), 781. Retrieved from DOI: 10.1016/S0097-8493(01)00120-0;
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TYG-43XNJ4Y-
6/2/588c967cc29d0153bca9f35d8c116769
Schuemie, M. (2003). Human-computer interaction and presence in virtual reality exposure
therapy. Delft University of Technology).
Scribante, V. (2000). Impact de deux facteurs d’influence sur l’acquisition des connaissances
spatiales. Université de Genève).
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). In The University of Illinois Press: Urbana. (Ed.), The
mathematical theory of communication (The University of Illinois Press: Urbana. ed.)
Shaun , B. (1996). Modelling parallel and distributed virtual reality systems for performance
analysis and comparison. Department of Computer Science, Rhodes University).
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
158 Bibliographie
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1978). The social psychology of telecommunications.
Contemporary Sociology, 7, 32-33.
Simmross-Wattenberg , F., Carranza-Herrezuelo, N., Palacios-Camarero, C., Higuera, J. P.,
Martin-Fernandez, M. A., Aja-Fernandez, S., et al. (2005). Group-slicer: A collaborative
extension of the 3D-slicer. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 38(6), }oume 38, ssue 6,
Deember 2005, Pages 431-442.
Slater, M., & Usoh, M. (1994). Body centered interaction in immersive virtual environments.
Artificial Life and Virtual Reality, , 125-148.
Slater, M., Sadagic, A., Usoh, M., & Shroeder, R. (2000). Small-group behaviour in a virtual and real
environment: A comparative study Retrieved from citeseer.ist.psu.edu/slater00small.html
Son, J., Gruts, Y., Kwack, K., Cha, K., & Kim, S. (2007). Stereoscopic image distortion in
radial camera and projector configurations. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics,
Image Science, and Vision, 24(3), 643-650.
Sutherland, I. E. (1965). The ultimate display. Paper presented at the Proceedings of IFIP, 506-
508.
Torguet, P., Balet, O., Gobbetti, E., Jessel, J. P., Duchon, J., & Bouvier, E. (1999). Cavalcade:
A system for collaborative prototyping. Laval, France. 161-170.
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
Bibliographie 159
Van Wyk, E., & de Villiers, R. (2008). Usability context analysis for virtual reality training in
south african mines. Paper presented at the SAICSIT '08: Proceedings of the 2008 Annual
Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists
on IT Research in Developing Countries, Wilderness, South Africa. 276-285. Retrieved from
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1456659.1456691
VIPER. (1998). VIPER library. Retrieved 2009http://vr.cs.
fr/cavalcade/technology_viper.html
Ware, C., & Jessome, D. R. (1988). Using the bat: A six dimensional mouse for object
placement. Paper presented at the Proceedings on Graphics Interface '88, Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada. 119-124.
Ware, C., & Osborne, S. (1990). Exploration and virtual camera control in virtual three
dimensional environments. SIGGRAPH Comput.Graph., 24(2), 175-183. Retrieved from
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/91394.91442
Welch , G., Yang, R., Cairns , B., Towles , H., Ilie, A. S. A., Russo , D., et al. (2004). 3d
telepresence for off-line surgical training and on-line remote consultation. Paper presented
at the The University of Tokyo, 113-152.
Wilson, P. N., Foreman, N., Gillett, R., & Stanton, D. (1997). The effect of landmarks
on route-learning in a computer-simulated environment. Journal of Environmental, 14, 305-
313.
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
160 Bibliographie
Zheng, X. S., McConkie, G. W., & Schaeffe, B. (2003). Navigational control effect on
representing
Table des Matières
Table des matières
Chapitre I - Introduction - 9
I.1 - Contexte de recherche - 9
I.2 - Problématiques - 10
I.3 - Questions de recherche - 11
I.4 - Contributions - 13
I.5 - Structure de la thèse - 14
Chapitre II - État de l’art - 15
II.1 - Introduction - 15
II.2 - La réalité virtuelle - 15
II.2.1 - Définitions - 15
II.2.2 - Applications de la réalité virtuelle - 17
II.2.3 - Interaction 3D - 18
II.2.4 - Techniques et métaphores d’interaction 3D - 20
II.2.5 - Périphériques d’entrée pour l’interaction - 20
II.2.6 - Périphériques d’affichage pour l’interaction - 29
II.3 - Communication - 32
II.3.1 - Modèle de communication de Shannon et Weaver - 32
II.3.2 - Communication interpersonnelle - 33
II.3.3 - Collaboration - 36
II.4 - Environnements virtuels collaboratifs EVCs - 37
II.4.1 - Introduction - 37
II.4.2 - Définition - 37
II.4.3 - Affordances des EVCs pour la collaboration à distance - 38
II.4.4 - Plateformes du travail collaboratif existantes - 41
II.4.5 - Études empiriques dans les EVC - 50
II.5 - Conclusion - 52
Chapitre III - Approche scientifique - 55
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
4 Table des matières
III.1 - Introduction - 55
III.2 - Problématique scientifique - 55
III.3 - Méthode d’évaluation - 57
III.3.1 - Introduction - 57
III.3.2 - Choix de la technique d’évaluation - 59
III.4 - Mesures - 60
III.4.1 - Mesures subjectives - 60
III.4.2 - Mesure objective - 62
III.4.3 - Description des mesures - 62
III.5 - Conditions expérimentales - 66
III.5.1 - Sélection/Manipulation - 66
III.5.2 - Navigation - 67
III.6 - Conclusion - 67
Chapitre IV - Technologies développées - 69
IV.1 - Introduction - 69
IV.2 - Tracking 3D - 70
IV.2.1 - Problématique - 70
IV.2.2 - Description du système - 70
IV.2.3 - Calibrage d'un système de stéréovision - 71
IV.2.4 - Détection des marqueurs infrarouges - 73
IV.2.5 - Mise en correspondance des marqueurs infrarouges - 74
IV.2.6 - Stabilisation et performances - 76
IV.2.7 - Matériel - 79
IV.2.8 - Couplage tracking 3D Wiimote - 80
IV.3 - Applications - 80
IV.3.1 - Navigation - 81
IV.3.2 - Manipulation - 82
IV.4 - Plateforme Braccetto - 83
IV.5 - Collaboration distante entre deux Braccettos - 84
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
Table des matières 5
IV.5.1 - Architecture réseau - 84
IV.5.2 - Distribution des données - 86
IV.5.3 - Protocole de communication - 87
IV.5.4 - Principe de fonctionnement - 88
IV.6 - Conclusion - 89
Chapitre V - Expérimentations - 91
V.1 - Expérimentation sur la navigation 3D en EVC - 91
V.1.1 - La navigation 3D - 91
V.1.2 - L’étude expérimentale - 94
V.2 - Expérience sur la manipulation 3D en EVC - 115
V.2.1 - La manipulation 3D - 115
V.2.2 - L’étude expérimentale - 118
V.3 - Conclusion - 132
Chapitre VI - Conclusion et perspectives - 135
VI.1 - Introduction - 135
VI.2 - Contributions - 135
VI.2.1 - État de l’art - 136
VI.2.2 - Système de tracking optique - 136
VI.2.3 - Applications - 136
VI.2.4 - Evaluations - 137
VI.2.5 - Critères de conception - 140
VI.3 - Limitations - 142
VI.3.1 - Limitations technologiques - 142
VI.3.2 - Limitations liées à l’évaluation - 142
VI.4 - Perspectives - 143
VI.4.1 - Retour d’effort à l’échelle 1 - 143
VI.4.2 - Travail collaboratif asymétrique - 143
VI.4.3 - Plateforme multiutilisateurs - 144
Evaluation de métaphores d’interaction pour le travail collaboratif entre sites distants
d’immersion virtuelle
6 Table des matières
VI.4.4 - Analyse linguistique et charge cognitive - 144
VI.4.5 - Vers un modèle comportemental du travail collaboratif - 144
Bibliographie - 145
Annexe A : Questionnaires - 166
Questionnaire d’entrée - 166
Questionnaire de navigation - 168
Questionnaire de manipulation - 172
Annexe B : Protocole d’expérience - 176
Annexe C : La Stéréovision - 186
Administrateurs de l'archive uniquement : éditer cet enregistrement